"Hillary Clinton Faces Test of Record as Women’s Advocate" was the title of the New York Times article.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
But it turns out, the record discussed isn't even HRC's. Instead, the record is that of Arab states. But through the magic of reporting the controversy instead of common sense, the NYTimes managed to hang other countries' practices, some of which she has criticized by name, on her.
By reporting the criticisms of a charity, not for what it does, but for what the people giving money to it do, the NYTimes continues its complicity with the VRWC in finding new standards to apply to Clintons only.
More behind the orange superampersand.
Read More