Skip to main content

California Democrats should take a lesson from the Massachusetts’ Scott Brown affair.  Complacency is not an option.  Neither is sitting out the November election.  The fact that Barack Obama is not on the ballot is not an excuse for Democratic voters not to participate.  Meg Whitman is a calamity in the making and I will explain why below the fold.

Many will be quick to point out that California’s real problem is a gridlocked State Assembly and State Senate with hidebound Republicans that won’t raise taxes and hidebound Democrats that won’t cut programs, especially social services.  The problem is slightly more complicated, however.  Past Republican governors, the present one included, have shown minimal leadership, and by doing so, have enabled the obstructive tendencies of the seemingly-permanent Republican minorities in Sacramento, when what they really need is a good kick in the ass. Pete Wilson, like George Deukmejian before him, was in the back pocket of Big Agriculture and Big Finance, and had little, if any interest in California’s crumbling infrastructure, education system, and eroding social fabric.  During their respective watches, prison populations swelled, but that’s a whole ‘nuther story.  Both Wilson and Deukmejian were decidedly anti-labor in a manner reminiscent of Dust-Bowl-Era, strike-busting Governor Frank Merriam. The oppressive climate during Merriam’s tenure led to the banning and burning, in Kern County, of John Steinbeck’s 20th-Century classic, "The Grapes of Wrath."  But I digress...

To put the impact of California’s most recent Republican governors in its proper perspective it is important to remember that both Wilson and Deukmejian were the political progeny of Ronald Reagan, California’s 33rd Governor.  Reagan liked to talk the talk when it came to the subject of illegal aliens, but under pressure from his corporate masters over at Big Ag, Reagan reached an understanding with INS that would ensure a steady stream of cheap labor to work the fields of the Central, Salinas, and Imperial Valleys.  Reagan was no friend of labor then, and later during his presidency, when his singular act of firing striking air traffic controllers, rather than consider their legitimate grievances, handed the American labor movement its worst defeat in decades.

Where am I going with this you ask?  Meg Whitman, the likely Republican candidate in the California gubernatorial race this year, appears to be cut out of the same ideological cloth as Wilson, Deukmejian, and yes, Ronald Reagan.  Same shit, different day, as they say.  Bear in mid that she cannot do anything without the cooperation of the Democratic majorities in Sacramento.  But in order to deliver tax cuts to the wealthiest Californians and to the corporate infrastructure, as promised, she will need to force cuts to both education and social programs.  Sound familiar?  It is very likely that she will back "Girly-Man" Sacramento Democrats into a corner, as Arnold has effectively done at times, and thereby gain concessions.  She will likely play the immigration card, albeit "politely," and claim that California taxpayers should not foot the bill for illegal aliens, all the while winking at her Del Monte benefactors.  She will push for re-districting in an attempt to erode the Democratic dominance in Sacramento that has been a bulwark against corporate hegemony and abandonment of the State’s traditional social safety-net.

Maybe Meg Whitman is the "wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing" that Carly Fiorina is accusing Tom Campbell of being.

Originally posted to mojave mike on Wed Mar 31, 2010 at 09:59 AM PDT.

Poll

Are you a?

48%64 votes
44%58 votes
5%7 votes
1%2 votes

| 131 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site